Saturday, June 29, 2013

Weddings Used To Be Sacred And Other Lessons About Internet Journalism

wedding photoEditor's note: Sean Parker is the executive general partner at Founder's Fund. Previously he was co-founder of Napster and the founding president of Facebook. He currently serves as a director of Spotify. My wife and I met 5 years ago and almost immediately began fantasizing about having a wedding in an enchanted forest. But life rarely works out the way it does in fairy tales.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/A94CyFTQZDk/

Dell Levis Fireman Ed Allegiant Air Melissa Rycroft Cyber Monday Deals 2012 Sasha McHale

Naverrette: On immigration, GOP offers fear, not ideas (CNN)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/315841920?client_source=feed&format=rss

harden nor easter nor easter veep los angeles kings timothy leary jonathan frid

A long way from Stonewall, and sometimes a slog

WASHINGTON (AP) ? From Stonewall in New York in 1969 to the marble walls of the Supreme Court, the push to advance gay rights has moved forward, often glacially but recently at a quickening pace. A look at episodes in the modern history of that movement and how attitudes have changed along the way in the larger culture:

FLASH BACK

Fifty years ago, gay sex was a crime in almost every state, homosexuality was designated a mental disorder, federal workers could easily lose their jobs for being gay and only the outliers were out of the closet, a risky if not dangerous place to be.

FLASH FORWARD

Gay marriage is legal in a dozen states and the District of Columbia, and could soon be again in California after the court's ruling Wednesday.

Gays can serve openly in the armed forces and do so in high office, including Congress. Eight people who have served as a U.S. ambassador or been nominated for that post are openly gay. Openly gay entertainers are commonplace, athletes less so.

It can still be dangerous to be out of the closet, which is why Congress expanded federal hate-crimes legislation in 2009 to cover crimes motivated by bias against gays, lesbians and transgender people. The law is named after Matthew Shepard, a gay college student tied to a fence, beaten and left to die in a 1998 case that sparked hate-crimes laws around the country.

IN THE COURT

The Supreme Court turned a stone cold face to Frank Kameny in 1961, declining to hear his appeal after he was fired as a government astronomer for being gay. It did so again in 1970, dismissing an appeal by two men in Minnesota who fought for the right to marry. And in 1986, the court upheld a Georgia law criminalizing sodomy, part of a patchwork of laws around the nation that once made gay sex a crime coast to coast.

The tide began to shift in the 1990s. In 1996, a ruling by the high court opened an avenue for states to protect gays as a class against discrimination. It struck down a Colorado measure that sought to bar homosexuals from gaining protections that are extended to other groups based on their race or religion.

In 2003, 10 years to the day before Wednesday's rulings, the Supreme Court stripped away the taboo at the heart of gay relationships, ruling that consensual sex between adults was not a crime so state sodomy laws could not stand. The court reversed its ruling of 17 years earlier on the Georgia law, and Justice Antonin Scalia, in a pointed and seemingly prophetic dissent, predicted it would clear the way for same-sex marriage.

Two years before his death in 2011, Kameny received an apology from the government for firing him. The apology came from John Berry, then director of the Office of Personnel Management, now nominated as ambassador to Australia, himself openly gay.

The rulings Wednesday extend federal recognition to gay marriages in the states where they are legal and seem bound to add California back into that category. But they leave same-sex marriage prohibitions standing in 35 states ? 29 under state constitutions, six under state laws ? and the overarching question of marriage equality as a national right unresolved. Two states, New Mexico and New Jersey, neither approve nor ban gay marriage.

IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION

In 1996, when the Defense of Marriage Act became law, the University of Chicago's General Social Survey reported that 60 percent of respondents considered homosexual sex "always wrong." With political opinion closely tracking public sentiments in that election year, the ground was hardly fertile for something as far-reaching as gay marriage.

In September of that year, the Senate backed DOMA and its prohibition of federal recognition of same-sex gay marriage by a lopsided 85-14 vote, and later that month President Bill Clinton signed it. Although he said he didn't like the law, he made clear ? as did almost everyone else in both parties ? that he considered marriage to be a union between a man and a woman.

That was the prevailing bottom line in Washington right up until last year, when President Barack Obama endorsed gay marriage in a flip-flop that he called an evolution.

Separately in 1996, a bill to establish anti-discrimination measures in the workplace for gays failed, though the vote was much closer.

Grim as the picture appeared then for gay rights activists, there were signs of a slow thaw in public attitudes. A few years earlier, fully 75 percent frowned on gay sex in the Social Survey. In 1996, more people thought extramarital sex was wrong than opposed gay sex.

Social scientists found that Americans were more open to a situation or a behavior when it was distant from their daily lives. So support for employment equality was stronger for the gay airline pilot than for the grade school teacher, stronger for gays in the armed forces than for gays adopting children, stronger for domestic partnership benefits in the workplace than for the right of a gay couple to get an apartment in your building.

Public attitudes have changed dramatically ? and in part for reasons that turn out to be close to home.

An Associated Press-National Constitution Center poll in the fall found 53 percent favored legal recognition of same-sex marriage and 63 percent favored granting gay couples the same legal benefits straight couples had. Other polls, too, pointed to a switch to majority support for gay marriage. In March, the Pew Research Center, which pegged support for marriage equality at 49 percent, found that support had grown in large measure because more people knew someone who was gay ? a family member, friend or acquaintance. Familiarity had bred acceptance.

MILESTONES

What became known as the gay liberation movement traces its roots to the 1969 police crackdown of patrons at the Stonewall Inn gay bar in New York City and three days of riots that followed. Also in 1969, a U.S. Court of Appeals ruling barred the firing of civil servants solely because they were gay.

By then, the Mattachine Society, considered the first national gay rights organization, had been around for nearly two decades but activists largely stayed out of the public eye until the 1970s, a decade of change, bold demands for more and the first national gay rights march on Washington.

In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder.

The decade saw the first openly gay people elected to public office as well as the election of other officials committed to the cause. In the 1980s, the spread of AIDS and its devastating toll among gay men galvanized calls for action, not just to control the epidemic but to redress the absence of legal protections for gays who could not visit their partners in hospital rooms, attend their funerals or keep shared possessions after death.

The election of a Democratic president in 1992 held out the promise of a change in course for gay activists frustrated by the years of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. But Clinton was not about to upend the social order.

As a leader promoting a "third way" somewhere between the usual politics of the left and the right, Clinton took measured steps on gay rights, perhaps most notably his compromise on gays in the military. The "don't ask, don't tell" policy that allowed gays to serve as long as they weren't open seemed to please no one on either side ? though for such an unpopular step, it survived a long time.

The pace of federally financed AIDS research picked up; Clinton established an AIDS policy office in the White House.

More politicians began supporting the recognition of same-sex civil unions while drawing a line against marriage equality. But a court case through the early 1990s in Hawaii, in which three same-sex couples fought for the right to marry, prompted a rush to the ramparts by opponents of gay marriage and set the stage for enactment of the law barring federal recognition of such unions.

That law and the swirling circumstances around it were a catalyst for action for supporters and opponents alike.

In 1998, Hawaii voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment giving lawmakers the power to deny same-sex marriage, making the court case irrelevant. Thirty other states would pass amendments against gay marriage in years to come. Among them: California, where the ability for gays to marry is expected to be restored because of the Supreme Court ruling.

Massachusetts, in 2004, became the first state to permit gay marriage. More followed suit.

In 2010, a court struck down Florida's three-decade-old ban on adoptions by gays.

In 2011, Obama ended the Clinton-era compromise in military policy by opening the forces to people who are openly gay.

In 2012, voters approved same-sex marriage in Maine, Maryland and Washington state. This year, Rhode Island, Delaware and Minnesota are coming on board.

Because of the Supreme Court's action Wednesday, 30 percent of Americans will live in states recognizing same-sex marriage once California legalizes it.

That's a long journey in time, and attitudes, from Stonewall 44 years ago. But these are far from the final steps for either side.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/long-way-stonewall-sometimes-slog-071317208.html

mad cow pennsylvania primary jerome simpson hand sanitizer obama on jimmy fallon pilar sanders andrew young

Friday, June 28, 2013

Take our Apps Survey for a chance to win a $100 Best Buy Gift Card!

Talk Mobile 2013

We're fans of numbers and quantifiable data here at Mobile Nations, and so following after the second week of Talk Mobile 2013, we're turning to our good friend the survey to help compile some data. Week two was focused on apps, apps, apps and developers, developers, developers. If you missed any of the content, be sure to click over to our Talk Mobile hub and check it out.

The mobile apps survey will only take a minute or two to complete, and as an extra incentive (not that you guys and gals need it, but we like to give things away), by completing the survey you'll be entered for a chance to win a $100 Best Buy Gift Card. Hit the link below to take the survey!

    


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/TUomNJ-QTks/story01.htm

asante samuel salton sea arizona immigration law aubrey huff the killers julianne hough brandy

'Don't touch my junk DNA!' says gene signal sequence

Scientists at MIT say they have discovered a mechanism that prevents noncoding DNA from being copied, by pointing the copying in the right direction.?

By Eoin O'Carroll,?Staff / June 25, 2013

A computer illustration of the double-helix structure of DNA. Scientists say that they have uncovered a mechanism that prevents cells from copying so-called junk DNA.

The Wellcome Trust/Reuters

Enlarge

Almost all of the human genome is made of noncoding, or "junk" DNA, that is, DNA that usually doesn't get copied and encoded into proteins.?

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; // google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

So when copying DNA, how do cells tell the diference between actual genes and non-coding DNA??

Transcription begins at regions on the DNA molecule called promoters, sequences located at the beginning of genes that are to be copied. The enzyme that copies DNA, called RNA polymerase, latches on to the promoter and starts unzipping the DNA double helix, spooling out a chain of what will become messenger RNA ? mRNA for short ? that contains the information of the gene. [Editor's note: The original version of this paragraph used the term "replication" instead of "transcription." DNA replication is a different process. The Monitor regrets the error.] ?

But how does the RNA polymerase know which direction to go? Until now, scientists didn't know. But in research published in the current issue of the scientific journal Nature,?MIT biologists say they have discovered the mechanism that points transcription in the right direction.?

In all living things except bacteria, the RNA polymerase continues unzipping the DNA until it reaches a stop signal, at which point it stops copying and begins adding a chain of adenine bases to the pre-mRNA molecule, usually a couple hundred links long. This "poly-A" tail protects the mRNA as it exits the nucleus and travels to the ribosome, where the molecule's information is synthesized into proteins.

By sequencing mRNA of mouse embryonic stem cells, the researchers found that the signal sequences for creating poly-A tails ? a process known as polyadenylation ? are also prevalent "upstream" from the promoter. An RNA polymerase that encounters these sequences will chop up its pre-mRNA. Sequences of DNA that are to be coded into genes, by contrast, have a low density of?polyadenylation signal sequences.

The researchers also found that the?polyadenylation signal sequences are more likely to be?ignored when they appear within coding sequences, thanks to a tiny protein complex called U1 snRNP. When?U1 snRNP binds to an RNA polymerase,?polyadenylation is supressed. The researchers discovered that binding sites for?U1 snRNP are more prevalent in coding sequences than noncoding ones.

?Once you see some data like this, it raises many more questions to be investigated, which I?m hoping will lead us to deeper insights into how our cells carry out their normal functions and how they change in malignancy,? says?Phillip Sharp, a professor at MIT's Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research and a co-author of the study, in a statement.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/science/~3/yhaeIJ_jQoc/Don-t-touch-my-junk-DNA!-says-gene-signal-sequence

arrested development arrested development Champions League Everett Golson June Carter monsanto Neymar

Thursday, June 27, 2013

?MythBusters? revisit previously busted case

TV

June 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM ET

What "MythBusters" fans want, "MythBusters" will give! In 2007, the hit Discovery show took on the case of the "Bifurcated Boat." A man who was driving a speedboat had crashed into a channel marker, and the accident had nearly split the boat in two. Sounds like speed was involved, right? Maybe not. The man claimed that he was going just a measly 25 MPH.

"MythBusters" to the rescue! With some tests, the gang busted the tale after their model boat merely glanced off their marker with little damage. But viewers complained about the bust, so the show is now revisiting the myth in its 10th season, and Discovery is sharing an exclusive look at the second attempt to bust the myth with TODAY.com.

"Our results were less than spectacular," Grant Imahara admits in the clip. "But according to you fans, that's because our methodology was totally wrong!"

"Because we didn't do it on water!" Kari Byron adds in the video.

Testing damage to a boat and not using a body of water of some sort? No wonder fans wanted a redo!

And it turns out there were some other problems too when testing the myth the first time. (Including an accident involving dropping one boat. Oops!) Take a look at some of the blunders, as well as what the "MythBusters" plan to do to make this attempt more accurate:

"MythBusters" airs Wednesdays at 9 p.m. on Discovery.

Source: http://www.today.com/entertainment/mythbusters-revisit-previously-busted-case-bifurcated-boat-6C10448418

curacao curacao home run derby kourtney kardashian kourtney kardashian DNS Changer ernest borgnine

Xinjiang's Deadliest Violence in Years Renews Focus on Ethnic Tensions (Voice Of America)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/315466406?client_source=feed&format=rss

khan academy Espn College Football Eddie Murphy died Suzanne Barr Clint Eastwood speech Maria Montessori clint eastwood